Connect with us

Politics

Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O’Malley Face Off in 3RD #DemDebate

Published

on

Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O'Malley Face Off in 3RD #DemDebate

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley meet for the third time Saturday night in a debate that could contain more fireworks than anticipated following a dispute between Sanders and the Democratic National Committee over the party’s voter database, after some of the Vermont senator’s staffers accessed Clinton’s voter data.

The debate, held at Saint Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., is hosted by ABC and the New Hampshire Union Leader. David Muir and Martha Raddatz of ABC News are the moderators.

Follow along here for all the latest updates; all times are Eastern.

10:20 pm

The topic is the heroine epidemic.

Sanders says we have to tell the medical profession “they’ve got to their acts together” in terms of flooding the market with opiates, which lead to heroin addiction. He also cited the need for increased access to treatments for the addicted. Clinton uses the opportunity to cite her personal interactions with families who’ve lost a loved one from overdose. She cites a plan for $10 billion in federal spending over 10 years to work with states. She also cites the need for more facilities and that police should carry with them the antidote to heroin overdose. O’Malley says the investment should be $12 billion. “That very time they show up with a near miss” at the hospital, “we should be intervening.”

10:14 pm

How to bridge the divide between law enforcement and minority communities that they are supposed to protect? The FBI director has said a backlash against all law enforcement has created a “chill wind” going through law enforcement.

“We have systemic racism and injustice and inequities” that “must be addressed,” says Clinton. Trust has been lost between law enforcement and the communities they are supposed to protect. Yet some officers are bridging the divide on their own. We need a bipartisan commitment to work together and “hear the voices” of Americans who’ve been harmed.

“It’s possible to improve how we police the police,” says O’Malley, citing what he enacted in Maryland.Sanders and O’Malley cite drug treatment and sentencing reform. Sanders also cites community policing. “We need to make police departments look like the communities they serve” and to end minimal sentencing, invest in jobs and education and not more jails.

10:04 p.m.

The topic is taxes.

Clinton vows not to raise taxes on the middle class, or families earning $250,000 or less. Sanders says Clinton’s pledge is tantamount to disagreeing with Lyndon Johnson on Medicare and Franklin Roosevelt on Social Security, in addition to measure like paid family and medical leave. “I have a way that actually makes the wealthiest pay for it,” says Clinton.

9:57 p.m.

The cost of college is the issue.

Sanders is asked why his plan for tuition-free college isn’t just shifting the costs to the American people through the form of higher taxes.

Sanders says hundreds of thousands of bring young people cannot go to college because their families can’t afford it. He cites a speculation tax on Wall Street to raise “substantial amounts of money.” We need “radical changes” in the area of college education because all people should be able to get it.

“This one falls under the category of ‘I’ve already done this,’” says O’Malley, who calls for more money into Pell Grants. He cites a block grant program for the states and an income-based program for students. He cites his own student loan debt burden from the education of his children, which they’ll pay for the rest of their lives. He says Clinton has borrowed his proposals.

Clinton calls her plan “the new college compact.” The federal government will match money the states put back into the system. She says she doesn’t believe in free college for everyone, and that the focus should be working class and poor children. She has proposed debt-free tuition for those students.

Clinton also takes a swing at Sanders for proposing debt-free college and a single-payer health care system. “We’ve got to be really thoughtful about how we’re going to afford what we propose,” she says. Sanders says the middle class will pay substantially less because we would be doing away with private insurance.

9:52 p.m.

Health care is the topic

How would you fix Obamacare?

Clinton says she’d build on its successes and “fix some of the glitches.” Out-of-pocket costs and prescription drug costs have gone up too much. She wants Medicare to be able to negotiate just like those companies negotiate with other country’s health systems. Make sure the health exchanges are “properly regulated so we are not being gamed.” We don’t have enough competition and oversight of insurance companies and what they’re charging, she says.

Sanders, who is calling for a single-payer system, is asked how much people will be expected to pay. He calls Obamacare “a step forward.” Even so, 29 million Americans still have no health insurance and millions still can’t afford to go to the doctor. We also spend three times more per capita than what Britons pay. He says the insurance and drug companies “are bribing” the Congress. He says the average middle-class family will save thousands of dollars, without answering the question.

9:40 p.m.

How do you raise incomes for middle-income families?

Sanders goes first. First, tell the wealthy their taxes are going up to “pay their fair share,” then raise the minimum wage, pass pay equity laws for women, put a tax on Wall Street speculation and make sure universities are tuition free. O’Malley cites his record in Maryland, including raising the minimum wage. He cites job creation from supporting the renewable energy industry, including solar. He cites universal national service to help cut youth employment.

Clinton weighs in by sounding like a general election candidate. She says economic mobility is an issue that unites Democrats, while none of the Republicans will raise the minimum wage or support policies to increase the incomes of middle-class Americans, citing similar issues including college affordability and the minimum wage. “This is the kind of debate we need to take to the Republicans in the fall.”

She’s asked in a follow-up question if corporate American should love her. “Everybody should,” she says. She outlines her populist agenda before saying, essentially, that business leaders aren’t always the bad guys. Buffet rule including 30% tax rates on billionaires, “But I also want to create jobs and I want to be a partner with the private sector.” Sanders is asked the same question, if corporate America will like him.  “Nope they won’t,” he says, before launching into his of Wall Street and call for reinstatement of Glass-Steagall laws breaking up big banks. The greed of Wall Street is destroying this economy” and millions of lives. “I will fight and lead,” says Sanders.

O’Malley hits Clinton for comments in the last debate, held in Iowa, on the issue of her closeness to Wall Street.  “She tried to hide her cozy relationship” with Wall Street by citing the 9/11 terrorist attacks, said O’Malley, and she still won’t support breaking up the big banks. Clinton hits back: O’Malley “had no trouble” going to Wall Street for financial handouts when he headed the Democratic Governors Association.

9:20 p.m.: 

On fighting Assad and ISIS:

Sanders and Clinton clash over Middle East policy. “Our differences are fairly deep on this issue,” says Sanders. She listened to Bush and Cheney and voted for the Iraq War and is “too much into regime change” and “too aggressive” without appreciating the consequences of what happens afterwards. “Getting rid of dictators is easy,” but you have to think about “what happens the day after.”

Clinton says Sanders voted for regime change in Libya and to get rid of former leader Muammar Gaddafi. If we had not joined with Europeans “you would be looking at Syria.”

The two clash over whether the priority should be ousting Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad or destroying ISIS. Clinton says they need to focus on both and Sanders says that’s flawed. “The major priority right now,” says Sanders, “should be destroying ISIS.” O’Malley agrees with Assad that ISIS should be the priority. “We shouldn’t be the ones declaring that Assad must go,” said O’Malley. He derides a policy of “traveling the world looking for new monsters to destroy.”

Clinton says the reason “we’re in the mess we’re in” is because of Assad. “When we look at these complex problems I wish it could be either or,” she says, but leaving Assad in power helps create more terrorists “by the minute.” She says the world is behind us for a political solution but “we have to lead.”

9:10 p.m.

Sanders is asked why he won’t support combat troops in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. can’t be policemen of the world, he says.  There has to be a well-coordinated effort. “This is a war for the soul of Islam” and the troops on the ground should be Muslim, he says. Saudi Arabia and Qatar “have to step up to the plate,” said Sanders.

Clinton is asked whether she’s “fooling Americans” by saying we won’t send in combat troops. She says no, that’s exactly what ISIS wants to give them more targets and recruiting opportunities. “It’s absolutely the wrong policy” to imagine putting in tens of thousands of troops. She takes a dig at Trump for using rhetoric that alienates moderate Muslim allies needed to create a robust ground force.

Asked a follow-up question, Clinton again pushes back against the notion that the U.S. will wind up sending large numbers of U.S. troops to the region. If we put together a bigger coalition “I think we can be successful.”

O’Malley returns to his criticism that we’ve under invested in intelligence on the ground in the region and in diplomatic intelligence about leaders in the region.

9:07 p.m.

Clinton is asked what she thinks of halting Syrian refugees from coming to the U.S. It’s something that New Hampshire Gov. Maggie Hassan, a Democrat, supports.

“I don’t think a halt is necessary,” Clinton says. The U.S. should have a very tough screening process. “We don’t want to make it seem we are turning into a nation of fear,” said Clinton. After 18 months or so, we should prioritize those who have families here or who are mothers with small children, she said. That might soothe Americans who are uneasy about the idea. O’Malley is unequivocal against pausing immigration of refugees. “There is a pretty excruciating process” that they already go through. The victims are suffering genocide and brutality and we need to “act like the great country we are.”

9:04 p.m.

Would you create a law forcing tech executives to break into encrypted material to subvert terrorism plots?

Clinton does not agree that there should be a law. “I have a lot of confidence in our tech experts,” she said. “I would hope” they would work with law enforcement, which “needs the tools to keep us safe.”

O’Malley says the federal government should have to get warrants but the people creating these products “have an obligation” to work with law enforcement.

8:59 p.m.

What do you say to those supporting Donald Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims?

Clinton praises former President George W. Bush for reaching out to the Muslim community after 9/11. She says terrorists are using Trump’s words for recruitment. “They are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump” to recruit more radical Muslims, says Clinton.

Sanders says Trump is pulling the wool over the eyes of Americans by spewing hate about minority groups including Latinos and Muslims. Meantime he’s supporting policies that hurt average Americans. He thinks “low wages are a good idea.”

8:50 p.m.

On guns:

Responding to polls showing more Americans support purchasing guns to respond to the threat of terrorism, Clinton says it needs to be looked at as a “separate issue” from terrorism and accuses Republicans of fanning the flames of hate. Sanders says the vast majority of Americans support sensible gun safety measures, such as strengthening the instant background check system. O’Malley comes out swinging, saying Sanders voted against the 1993 Brady bill, for granting immunity for gun dealers. He then says Clinton “changes her positon on this issue every election year it seems.” He says he’s the only candidate who’s actually passed gun safety laws, as former governor of Maryland.

Sanders tells O’Malley to “calm down” and Clinton asks him to “tell the truth.” Sanders punches back and says “do not tell me that I have not shown courage in standing up to the gun people,” banning to ban assault weapons and for instant background checks. Clinton says O’Malley is misrepresenting her position. She supported the Brady bill and voted against giving gun dealers immunity, for instance. She calls on Sanders to sponsor legislation to remove the so-called Charleston loophole that allows people to purchase guns without a background check if the government hasn’t completed them in three days.

8:42 p.m.

Clinton outlines her ISIS strategy, including an American led air campaign, go after everything from North Africa to South Asia. At home, we have to do a better job of sharing intelligence and information, including from the Internet, she says. We have to work more closely with technology companies. We must also work more closely with Muslim communities. “They will be our early warning signal,” she said. We must work with them and “not demonize them,” like the Republicans are doing.

O’Malley highlights a lack of a robust counter terrorism strategy over the past 15 years. “The president had us on the right track,” but we need to increase the “battle tempo.”

Sanders highlights his vote against the war in Iraq and says he does not believe in unilateral American action. He says King Abdullah II of Jordan should be recognized as “one of the heroes” of the Middle East.

8:35 pm

Opening statements:

Clinton highlights the need to keep families safe and help the economy grow, not just for those at the top. She highlights her strategy to combat ISIS without another ground war. She says there’s a “distinct difference” between all of the Democrats and the Republicans, who would repeal the Affordable Care Act and give more tax breaks to corporations and the wealthy. Despite their “tough talk” they’d continue to let those on the no-fly terrorism watch list to buy guns, says Clinton.

O’Malley said tonight’s debate is different because of the terror attack in San Bernardino. He said he visited a mosque last week and say veterans, Boy Scouts and moms and dads. He said, in addition to terrorism, a major danger is “unscrupulous leaders” who “try to turn us against each other.” He says we must maintain our values against terrorists and “fascist pleas of billionaires with big mouths,” in an obvious slam against Republican Donald Trump.

Sanders highlights his stump theme of income inequality, before hitting other issues include transitioning from fossil fuel to sustainable energy and a new foreign policy that takes on and destroys ISIS but doesn’t get us “involved in perpetual warfare” in the quagmire in the Middle East. We need a coalition that supports Muslim ground troops in the Middle East.

The data breach of Clinton’s campaign data is the first question.

Sanders says there was a breach because the DNC vendor screwed up and information came to our campaign. “Our staff did the wrong thing, they looked at that information.” That person has been fired and they’re doing an internal investigation. But the DNC arbitrarily “shut off our access” to their own information. He called it “egregious.” He calls for an independent investigation into all data breaches as it’s unclear whether her campaign also had access to his campaign’s information. “It has become many press releases from the Clinton campaign.” He immediately agreed with the moderators’ suggestion that Clinton is owed an apology.

Clinton thanks him for the apology and says now that there’s an independent inquiry “we should move on.”

8:31 pm

The candidates take the stage.

8:10 pm 

Dem debate still at least 10 minutes away, getting off to a late start.

7:45 pm 

Test one, two three, the debate begins in 15 minutes!

Entrepreneur, contributor, writer, and editor of Sostre News. With a powerful new bi-lingual speaking generation by his side, Sostre News is becoming the preferred site for the latest in Politics, Entertainment, Sports, Culture, Tech, Breaking and World News.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Politics

‘Very Substantial Evidence’ Trump is ‘Guilty of High Crimes and Misdemeanors,’ Jerry Nadler says

Published

on

'Very Substantial Evidence' Trump is 'Guilty of High Crimes and Misdemeanors,' Jerry Nadler says

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on Sunday said Robert Mueller’s report presents “very substantial evidence” that President Donald Trump is “guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors” — an impeachable offense.

“We have to … let Mueller present those facts to the American people, and then see where we go from there, because the administration must be held accountable,” Nadler, whose committee would lead impeachment proceedings, said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Mueller, the former special counsel for the Department of Justice and former director of the FBI, will testify before Congress on July 24 after House Democrats issued a subpoena for his appearance. Earlier this year, Mueller concluded a nearly two-year-long investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Democrats are deeply divided on whether to pursue an impeachment inquiry, and Mueller’s public testimony may provide an opportunity for the party to unify and decide whether impeachment proceedings should go forward or not. More than 80 House Democrats have called for starting an impeachment inquiry into the President — the first step in a lengthy process, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Nadler have so far resisted the pressure to open an inquiry. Behind the scenes, Nadler has lobbied Pelosi to open an inquiry.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday most Americans haven’t read the dense 448-page Mueller report.

Schiff said on CBS “Face The Nation” that the report contains “a pretty damning set of facts,” and said, “Who better to bring them to life than the man who did the investigation himself.”
“We want the people to hear it directly from him,” Schiff said.

Mueller said in a rare and remarkable public statement in May his investigation could not clear Trump of obstruction of justice, and that charging the President was not an option his office could consider.

“If we had had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller said. “We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime.”

The former special counsel’s probe, which also investigated possible collusion, found that members of the Trump campaign knew they would benefit from Russia’s illegal actions to influence the election, but did not take criminal steps to help.

Mueller delivered a road map of how the investigation played out and the possible role that Congress could play in holding Trump accountable. He highlighted how the “Constitution requires a process other than” the criminal justice system to hold officeholders accountable, a clear signal his obstruction investigation into Trump could be carried on by Congress.

The impeachment clause in Article II of the US Constitution outlines the process of removing a president, which begins with a vote in the House of Representatives. Offenses that could prompt impeachment are treason, bribery or other “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Julián Castro Calls on Puerto Rico Governor to Resign

Published

on

Julián Castro Calls on Puerto Rico Governor to Resign

Democratic presidential contender Julián Castro called on embattled Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rosselló (D) to resign, saying “it’s clear” that the leader of the U.S. territory “can no longer be effective.”

Rosselló has resisted calls to resign as he struggles to cope with a corruption scandal involving former members of his administration and the release of hundreds of pages of messages between him and his top lieutenants that contained homophobic and misogynistic slurs.

“I stand with Puerto Ricans who are protesting in the streets his administration. We’ve seen comments that he and others in the administration have made, we’ve seen the use of force against the people of Puerto Rico,” Castro told reporters at a campaign stop in Manchester, N.H.

“This governor can no longer be effective and I believe he should resign,” added the former Housing and Urban Development secretary.

Two former members of Rosselló’s administration were arrested by the FBI earlier this month, accused of directing more than $15 million in government contracts to favored businesses.

Meanwhile, the Puerto Rican Center for Investigative Journalism released a trove of messages exchanged among Rosselló and his closest allies, including at least two Cabinet members, where homophobic and misogynistic slurs were directed at journalists and political rivals.

Rosselló has since apologized repeatedly for his role in the texting scandal. But protests demanding his resignation have rocked San Juan through the week.

An array of public officials, as well as several prominent Puerto Rican public figures, have also demanded Rosselló’s resignation.

And Rosselló, who is up for reelection in 2020, has lost much support within his own local party, the New Progressive Party (PNP).

“Reelection is out of the question, out of the question. The party has been clear and has expressed it in an elegant but concise manner,” Puerto Rico Senate Majority Leader Carmelo Ríos told The Hill Thursday.

President Trump on Thursday denounced Puerto Rico’s leaders as “corrupt” amid the massive protests demanding his resignation.

Puerto Rico’s government has been widely criticized for its response to Maria, which left thousands dead and devastated much of the island in 2017. But the Trump administration has also been the target of criticism for its disaster-relief efforts.

Continue Reading

Politics

Puerto Rico Governor Ricardo Rossello Says He’s Not Resigning After Private Chat Scandal

Published

on

Puerto Rico Governor Ricardo Rossello Says He's Not Resigning After Private Chat Scandal

Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rosselló said Monday that he has no plans to resign or give up his leadership of the pro-statehood New Progressive Party after a fierce public outcry over the release of profanity-laced and derogatory private chat messages with other officials and close associates.

Rosselló did say in a radio interview, however, that as a “tactical measure” he would think about whether he should seek re-election next year.

The messages, which included homophobic and misogynistic comments, have been strongly condemned by other officials in his party and drawn protests outside the governor’s mansion in Old San Juan. Some excerpts of the chats, on the instant messaging service Telegram, were leaked to local media on July 8th. The island’s Center for Investigative Journalism, which received the 889 pages from a source, published them in their entirety on Saturday.

In the chats, the group used disparaging and sexist terms to refer to San Juan’s mayor, Carmen Yulín Cruz, as well as former New York City Council President Melissa Mark-Viverito. They also belittled the death of independence movement leader Carlos Gallisá and slammed the federal control board overseeing the island’s finances.

READ MORE: Top Puerto Rican Officials Resign Amid Group Chat Scandal

The group used a homophobic comment in relation to international pop star Ricky Martin, who is from Puerto Rico. On Twitter, Martin urged Rosselló to step down.

The governor, Martin tweeted, “lacks the abilities of a true leader, who inspires, stimulates and guides by example so that our people attain a higher level of life.”

Over the weekend, a group of mayors and officials from the governor’s New Progressive Party, including the president of Puerto Rico’s House of Representatives, Carlos “Johnny” Mendez, had urged Rosselló to “re-evaluate” and reflect on his position. In a statement, they wrote that “the most recent publications of the content in the Telegram chat do not reflect in any way how our delegation or the party feels.”

On Saturday, Rosselló announced that other top officials who participated in the chats had submitted their resignations. This included the secretary of state, Luis G. Rivera Marín, who would have been next in line for the governorship if Rosselló were no longer in his position.

The commonwealth’s chief financial officer, Christian Sobrino, who is also the governor’s representative to the federal control board overseeing Puerto Rico’s finances, also announced he was stepping down. The federal control board was a topic in the chats.

The island’s justice secretary, Wanda Vázquez, announced that she was appointing a special task force to determine whether the comments in the chats broke any laws. On Monday, Rosselló said he had reviewed the chats and he said he had committed no wrongdoing.

The messaging scandal comes on the heels of the arrests of the island’s former secretary of education, Julia Keleher, and five other people on charges of steering federal money to unqualified, politically connected contractors.

It also occurs against the backdrop of the U.S. commonwealth’s ongoing attempts to recover after the devastation of Hurricane Maria in 2017 as well as Puerto Rico’s ongoing financial crisis.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending