The city of San Francisco has become the first to ban e-cigarette sales pending the clearing of their health effects. This happened on Tuesday after officials voted to ban the selling of vaporizers from stores, and making it illegal for online retailers to deliver e-cigarettes to any San Francisco address.
However for this law to be fully enforced, the San Francisco Mayor London Breed would have to sign off the legislation. She has been given 10 days to do so, and it would take another 10 months after she has signed for the law to begin to be enforced.
Among those who campaigned for this ban is the San Francisco city’s Lawyer, Dennis Herrera, who was happy about the ban. He said the ban was necessary because of what he called an “abdication of responsibility” by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in regulating e-cigarettes”.
According to an article published by the BBC News in August 2018, a study found that “vaping can damage vital immune system cells and may be more harmful than previously thought”. Researchers found that the effects of using e-cigarettes are similar to those of smoking cigarettes.
Not only that, but thousands of people have been injured due to malfunctioning e-cigarette batteries and in the case of a 24 year old Texas man, it resulted in a death. His vapor pen exploded when he tried to use it and it sent shards of metal into his face, neck and severed an artery. This resulted to him losing his life by stroke on January 29.
The Public Health England argued that e-cigarettes were less harmful than smoking and that people who were looking to quit smoking should use them instead. In 2018, it called to the National Health Service (NHS) to have e-cigarettes available on prescrition.
Another argument supporting the use of e-cigarettes came from Juul Labs, the most popular e-cigarette producer in the US, saying that the move to ban e-cigarettes would create a “thriving black market” and will drive smokers back to cigarettes.
The ball is now in the San Francisco’s Mayor’s court, but reports say that she has indicated that she would sign off the legislation.
Instagram Rolls Out New Plan To Remove Likes on Posts
Instagram launched in 2010 and no one could’ve predicted the global phenomenon it would soon become–well no one except for the wise guys at Facebook. Facebook acquired the photo app just 18 months after its launch, and since then, the social media platform has gone on to consume our time and our lives.
But now the app is looking to make one of its biggest shifts since its birth–removing likes. Likes are the currency to building coveted “influencer” status–a marker of fame that can turn your average Joe or Jane seemingly into a celebrity overnight.
Influencers caught the attention of advertisers and sponsors looking to “natively” introduce their products to audiences. These partnerships led to a lot of money and capital for individuals over the years–with those with 1 million followers and up earning around $10,000 to $250,000 per post.
But now removing “likes” threatens to pop the already vulnerable influencer bubble. As Instagram rolls out the new format overseas, users are wondering what the changes will mean for their social media consumption.
“We hope this test will remove the pressure of how many likes a post will receive, so you can focus on sharing the things you love,” Mia Garlick, Facebook Australia and New Zealand director of policy, said in a statement, according to BBC.
The change is also meant to encourage users to use the platform in the way it was originally intended, hoping, “this change can help people focus less on likes and more on telling their story”.
Continuing, Adam Mosseri, Instagram chief in Canada said, “We want people to worry a little bit less about how many likes they’re getting on Instagram and spend a bit more time connecting with the people that they care about.”
So far the roll out has taken place in Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Italy, Japan and Brazil.
What do you think of the changes?
FaceApp Old Age ‘Challenge’ is Back – But It Could Be Stealing Your Photos
Controversial photo-editing app FaceApp is back, with a new “challenge” showing what people will look like as they age.
The app, which launched in 2017, uses artificial intelligence to augment users’ facial expressions and make them look older or younger, or change their gender.
It has gone viral again in the last few days, with thousands of people posting “aged” selfies of themselves on social media, using the hashtag #FaceAppChallenge.
The challenge has proved so popular that even celebrities such as Gordon Ramsay, Sam Smith and Drake are getting involved.
— Gordon Ramsay (@GordonRamsay) July 16, 2019
View this post on Instagram
View this post on Instagram
However, some online privacy experts have raised concerns that the app, which is developed by Russian company Wireless Lab, could be accessing and storing users’ images without their permission.
The company’s terms and conditions state that, by using the app, users agree to allow FaceApp to use, modify, adapt and publish any images that they upload.
“You grant FaceApp a perpetual, irrevocable, nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, fully-paid, transferable sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, publicly perform and display your User Content,” the Ts&Cs state.
FaceApp is also allowed to use your name, username or any likeness provided in any media format it likes without compensation, meaning you will not be paid for it, or have any ability to take it down or complain about it.
FaceApp uploads your photo to the cloud for processing, rather than carry out on-device processing like many apps do. After doing so, it retains the image long after you’ve deleted the app.
“All of this should raise alarms whenever a free service is acting on sensitive information like images – the revenue to pay for the service is coming from somewhere and it’s likely the sale of data related to what the service provides,” said Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist at the Synopsys CyRC (Cybersecurity Research Center).
Moreover, according to TechCrunch, the app is able to access Photos on Apple’s iOS platform even if a user has set their photo permissions to “never”.
Shouldn’t photo access need to be enabled for this to be possible ? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/wy45zKn63E
— Karissa Bell (@karissabe) July 16, 2019
“Given how many screenshots people take of sensitive information like banking and whatnot, photo access is a bigger security risk than ever these days,” said Matthew Panzarino, Editor-In-Chief at TechCrunch.
“With a scraper and optical character recognition tech you could automatically turn up a huge amount of info way beyond ‘photos of people’.”
“The implications on privacy for apps like FaceApp is extremely concerning,” said Javvad Malik, security awareness advocate at KnowBe4.
“The app itself uses AI to digitally age users’ photos, which is fun from a novelty perspective, but the same types of AI is used to produce deepfake type of imagery which can be used for nefarious purposes such as public embarrassment or blackmail.
“The fact that FaceApp retains access to iOS photos without permission should be a red flag for all app store maintainers.|
FaceApp has had its fair share of controversies over the years.
Back in April 2017, Wireless Lab was forced to apologise after several users complained that its “hot” filter was lightening their skintone.
FaceApp’s CEO Yaroslav Goncharov claimed that it was an “unfortunate side-effect of the underlying neural network caused by the training set bias, not intended behaviour.”
Then in August of the same year, the app sparked outrage with the introduction of a new filter that allowed people to change their ethnicity in their selfies .
Responding to the backlash, Wireless Lab, removed the filters and withdrew the update from the App Store.
The Ring Video Doorbell is Down to its Lowest Price Ever for Amazon Prime day
Amazon Prime Day is officially here, and that means massive discounts on TVs, laptops, appliances and more. It also means killer deals on Amazon’s own devices, like the best-selling Ring Doorbell. Prime members can get the Ring Video Doorbell on sale for $69.99. That’s a $30 discount, and the lowest price we’ve seen for the Wi-Fi enabled video doorbell. Our Sostre News readers can also get the Ring doorbell on sale for $69.
The Ring Video Doorbell allows you to monitor your door from anywhere and lets you speak and talk to visitors from your device. The Ring will send alerts to your smartphone, tablet, or computer when motion is detected or when visitors press the doorbell. The Wi-Fi enabled doorbell offers live view on-demand video and infrared night vision. The Ring also works with Amazon Alexa so you can see, hear, and talk to visitors through Echo devices.
Like we mentioned above, this is the lowest price we’ve seen for the Ring doorbell and a fantastic deal for a Ring product. This sale will end Tuesday at midnight PDT, so you should take advantage of this killer deal while you can.
Say goodbye to package thieves and worrying about the safety of your home thanks to this doorbell that doubles as a security camera.
Ring is a wi-fi enabled video doorbell that allows you to see, hear and speak to visitors from your phone, tablet and PC. If you’re going to buy any security device on Amazon Prime Day, let it be this!
Ring is one of the most high-tech and compact home accessories that is making a splash in home security. It streams directly to your phone, giving you live video access whenever and wherever. Not to mention it’s also compatible with your Alexa and can send announcements to your Echo devices when your doorbell is pressed or when motion is detected. You can even connect it to your Echo Show or Echo Spot so you can keep an eye on your front door at all time.
It works on any home, with or without existing doorbell wires and it monitors your yard in HD video and has perfect night vision, for 24/7 surveillance and protection. Now you can stress less about package thieves and intruders.
Smart houses are no longer a thing of the past with Ring. Protect your home today!
- USA4 years ago
Search for Gunman Puts Community College of Philadelphia on Lockdown
- News4 months ago
‘Only Survivor’ Reveals Truth of Fatal Accident in 1994 Linked to Ricardo Rossello
- News5 months ago
VIDEO Pregnant Woman Fights in Parking Lot, Before Getting Hit and Run Over by SUV
- USA4 years ago
Hacktivist Group Anonymous Publishes Names of Alleged Ku Klux Klan Members
- ENTERTAINMENT4 years ago
Usher’s Naked Selfie Exposes Too Much Despite Attempt to Censor Image
- Breaking News3 years ago
Developments in Presidential Race, Trump does Terribly at Forum as Clinton shines
- Technology3 years ago
Segway Creator Dean Kamen Teaming With Toyota on Motorized Wheelchair That Climbs Stairs
- ENTERTAINMENT3 years ago
Marxism in Black Mirror, Social Media Reigns